Tuesday, July 23, 2019

Intellectual property project ( Business and Commercial law ) Assignment

Intellectual property project ( Business and Commercial law ) - Assignment Example This paper presents an example of a case in which the intellectual property legislation of the cell phone market has been breached. In the shop where I spotted this original HTC phone, it was selling at $120. However, according to what one of the shop attendants told me, the price was slightly negotiable. I guess it could sell as low as $110. The price of this product according to the shop, in which I spotted it, was $52. Comparing with the previous similar phone (real) that I had seen earlier, I got interested in why it was selling so cheap. At a glance, I could not notice any difference. However, after a close look at the phone, I noticed some differences from the original phone. The original HTC phones are manufactured by a company called HTC Corporation, with its headquarters in Xindian, New Taipei City, Taiwan. The company was formerly known as High-Tech Computer Corporation. State laws protect the intellectual properties. Any attempt use an intellectual property without authorization is considered infringement (Hg.org, 2015). The manufacturers of the fake hTC mobile phones violate the intellectual laws in a number of ways. The first and foremost, their product resembles the HTC corporation’s product by general look as well as the product name. The HTC label used on the phone is a trademark of HTC Corporation. Any other firm that sells products with a similar label violates the federal law No. 8 of 2002, as provided by the trade regulations in UAE. If the firm runs its businesses in United States, it would be a violation of the intellectual law, as provided in section 396(3A) of Act 1988 (Groves, 1997). The production of a product similar to those patented by another company is an offense. It violates the intellectual laws related to copyright, patent, design rights, just to mention a few. The manufacturer of the fake HTC mobile, in this case, violated the intellectual laws by manufacturing phone similar to the ones that existed

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.