Essay

Senator Robert TaftSenator Robert Taft s decision to speak up against the staging of the Nuremberg Trials in 1946 was a truly brave action . Heroism always lies on the side of virtue , and in judging the actions of Senator Taft we must discover where true up virtue resides in an the Statesn . We must exact the principles on which the American nation is founded , for a nation s fullness is established through the triumph of its principles . In the aftermath of the indorsement World War it was natural for a spirit of vengeance to prevail , and in such a climate the usual would plainly support what was supposed to be fair mental tests that convicted 11 Nazi war criminals to death . When Senator Taft raised a solitary dissenting voice against this orgy of revenge , he was universally vilified , and in doing so there is no doubt that he lost forfeited his political aspirations But most commentators , twain(prenominal) right off and then , state that he was correct in pointing live on that the American record does non allow what took channelise in Nuremberg . If America has won the war , it was certainly non for the vengeful spirit of its citizens , exactly for the principles of the nation that uphold autonomy and rightness . Senator Taft s is a heroic voice because he was reason content integrity , the alike which carried the soldiers to victory against the Nazi s . It is yet cowardice to squander national integrity on the promote of the moment , when the spoils of war helped kindle our baser naturesEmerson implores us towards heroism , which implies that we should not go dancing in the weeds of peace , and should own both reputation and action in [] hand , and , with ideal urbanity , dare the gibbet and the block by the absolute right of [] speech , and the rectitude of [] be havior (Emerson 1983 . If we examine the act! ions of Senator Taft we will surface that they comply exactly with Emerson s criteria of what makes the true hero . He dared both the gibbet and the mob when he saw the principles of his nation being squanders by his countrymen in the exuberance of victory . He pointed out that the Constitution does not permission what took place in Nuremberg in the name of a trial . He specifically points to word 1 , Section 9 , which states , No bill of attainder or ex chance facto law shall be passed .

He argued that the judging of war criminals needfully entails the imposition of ex post facto laws , because [t]he trial of the vanquished by the victors cannot be impartial no issue how it is hedged about with the forms of justice (qtd . in Kennedy 1961 ,. 198 . Taft s plea was establish on the sacred inviolability of the Constitution . The urge of the moment was to queer constitutional arguments , but Taft still wanted to remind his countrymen that they were committing a grave and fundamental delusion , to which end he move at risk his glint political prospects . We... ! Not the try out Youre looking for? procure a custom (only for $12.99 )If you want to take away a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay