King william i

King William I         Americans these days be too spoiled. freedom and abomination are far too rampant. What perpetually happened to the grave hoar days of unkind, bloodthirsty monarchs? Rulers who would send the citizens quivering with the classic call forth of their names. Kings whose wanton cruelty and disregard for hu service homosexual life blithe and amused us all. There is superstar occasion, and single matter alone, that we as a nation occupy to return us to the subservient, useless entities that we truly are. That one thing is a male monarch. What remediate objet dart for the job than William Jefferson Clinton?         A poof and Bill Clinton are so utterly mixed that I drive in I must laborious crazy, but just embrace this idea, hitherto ludicrous it whitethorn sound, for just a moment. I correspond think close it. Would it be that ofttimes of a trade? Clinton is already, by far, the or so fibrous existence in t he universe. let us just analyze the things that made a king and the things that raise Bill Clinton.         First of all, a king was suitable to net income war with whomever he wanted, with away the panegyric of a legislative body. Is that non what Clinton did front this year? We waged a war with a country tens of thousands of miles off under the flag of NATO, which Clinton practically controls allway. He used the fall in Nations as an excuse to intervene in something that didnt concern us because it was in the best interests of bitkind as a in all. That was non unlike the Treaty of Vienna in the 19th century. The conformance basically gave the virtually big businessmanful nations in Europe the responsibility to intervene and interfere in any conflict or uprising that was deemed harmful to the rest of Europe. The treaty was written by countries where, by and large, monarchy was still prevalent. So it would not be much of a change to just defecate Clinton a king because he is already the vi! rtually queenful man in the universe.         Kings were also able to enact any jurisprudences they saw fit, again, without the approval of a legislative body. Has Clinton not through this already? mob the partial-birth abortion law for example. forthwith I support a womans serious to abort her child but, in my opinion, this goes too far. This method of contraception was overwhelmingly opposed by both the rest home and Senate, both Republican controlled. The Republicans did everything in their clevernessiness to defeat this bill. However, on come Bubba and all of a sudden women have the right to have this atrocity performed on their partly born child. This power makes Clinton one step closer to being a king. So why not make it ordained? He is already the close to powerful man in the universe.         Kings were also above the law itself. No king was ever removed for breakage a law. Neither was Clinton. He has rugged numerous law and co mmitted traitorous acts during his presidency. For example the Whitewater thing. He abused his power as Arkansas state governor to further a multi-million dollar real estate study it on in which he was going to profit immensely. Was he charged? No, because he is Bill Clinton, the most powerful man in the universe.         He has repeatedly accepted nonlegal campaign contributions from former(a) nations in flip-flop for favors. Take the Chinese businessmen for example. Their illegal contributions served as call for on the Lincoln bedroom. That sordid miniature act has destroyed the prestige of the Lincoln bedroom, perhaps forever. Was he charged or even reprimanded. No, because he is Bill Clinton, the most powerful man in the universe.         He has also repeatedly sold American patents to the Chinese. Again, was he reprimanded? This traitorous act was treat by both the American justice system and the American people. Want to get laid why? Be cause he is Bill Clinton, the most powerful man in th! e universe.

         permit us not forget the whole impeachment fiasco. Clinton admittedly committed perjury in a depository to the grand jury in the Paula Jones internal harassment lineament (which I will get to later). lying under bane is a felony. Was Clinton charged, removed from office, or even formally reprimanded? No, because he is Bill Clinton, the most powerful man in the universe.         Which brings me to my terminal point: marital infidelity and moral ambiguity. Kings were cruel and merciless and concubines were rampant in the royal court. Back then if one was power ful, mistresses were looked upon as an unnecessary evil. Did that not already happen with Clinton?          allow us go through the list of some of the women he has had either sex with or has sexually harassed. The three most famous names are Paula Jones, Jennifer Flowers, and the now infamous Monica Lewinsky. Was he punished for his infidelity? Of course not. We even reelected him. Want to contend why? Because he is Bill Clinton, the most powerful man in the universe.         A fine example of his moral ambiguity is the whole marijuana thing. This was before we even elected him. He admittedly smoked an illegal substance. Was he punished? No, because he is Bill Clinton, the most powerful man in the universe. some(a) king say to impeach him or just to ask this out because he is leaving in just over a year anyway. However, I say no to this because he might be replaced with someone just as stinking or worse, such as Al Gore, the most dense man in the country. We made the mistake once, we can make it aga! in. The but available solution is to make him our unquestioned lord and master, Now I ask, is that so bad? If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay